Re: Plant list up
> >For example, Knautia
> >'Mars Midget' is 122.
> So KNA would have been too easy, hmm?
For Knautia it's not a problem, but what about RHO? Is it Rhodotypos?
The other advantage is that the code isn't tied to a plant name which can
change. If a genus changes (i.e. Cimicifuga to Actaea), it would be
confusing to have the code stay as CIM. This is one of the reasons
Heronswood switched to a numeric system -- they kept running into this
Normally it's not an issue, but when you have a Web site that links photos
and such in by the plant code, suddenly everything breaks. If I rename
CIM to ACT, every photo that has CIM in it would have to be renamed as
well. And all past orders would suddenly link to a name that no longer
> >So 122 becomes 07A
> No, it's 078. O7A is Lewisia.
Sorry. Typo. :)
> >The first part of the code is actually the genus -- each genus gets
> >its own number, and they're created sequentially.
> OK, Anemonella is 062 and Aquilegia is 063. so what happens if you decide
> to carry Anemonopsis?
It will become whatever number is next sequentially. In this case 0B5, or
> >The second part is base 10 and is an identifier for the species.
> >The first species in a genus is 0001, the second is 0002, etc.
> But not alphabetically? In Carex, the species conica is #11 while flacca
> is #3.
Right. They're just added in the order that they get added to the system.
So this year's numbers will probably be low; as I become involved with more
and more species the numbers will increase.
> This really makes it all easier for you?
Actually, yes. :)
There's another factor that came into play too. There are certain standards
for bar codes, and some don't allow letters, some don't allow spaces, etc.
Using a standard that only used 0-9, A-E and hyphens let me produce one of
the shortest barcodes so that I could fit them on the plant labels OK.
Otherwise I would have had to invest in a new laser printer that could print
a finer resolution. And of course, small barcodes are more susceptible to
errors, especially when printed on weatherproof labels that stay outdoors.
> Well, so long as it works for you, but it is a little awkward for the buyer
> because the system isn't evident. The genus sometimes has letters,
> sometimes doesn't, and when it does, the letter's not always in the same
> place. I'm not complaining, just noting that, to someone who doesn't have
> the inside scoop, it seems strange. (I've got the scoop and I'm still
So what you're saying is that I need to get the online store up, eh? ;)
To sign-off this list, send email to email@example.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |