hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Plant list up

> >For example, Knautia
> >'Mars Midget' is 122.
> So KNA would have been too easy, hmm?

For Knautia it's not a problem, but what about RHO?  Is it Rhodotypos?

The other advantage is that the code isn't tied to a plant name which can
change.  If a genus changes (i.e. Cimicifuga to Actaea), it would be 
confusing to have the code stay as CIM.  This is one of the reasons 
Heronswood switched to a numeric system -- they kept running into this

Normally it's not an issue, but when you have a Web site that links photos
and such in by the plant code, suddenly everything breaks.  If I rename
CIM to ACT, every photo that has CIM in it would have to be renamed as
well.  And all past orders would suddenly link to a name that no longer

> >So 122 becomes 07A
> No, it's 078. O7A is Lewisia.

Sorry.  Typo.  :)

> >The first part of the code is actually the genus -- each genus gets
> >its own number, and they're created sequentially.
> OK, Anemonella is 062 and Aquilegia is 063.  so what happens if you decide 
> to carry Anemonopsis?

It will become whatever number is next sequentially.  In this case 0B5, or

> >The second part is base 10 and is an identifier for the species.
> >The first species in a genus is 0001, the second is 0002, etc.
> But not alphabetically?  In Carex, the species conica is #11 while flacca 
> is #3.

Right.  They're just added in the order that they get added to the system.
So this year's numbers will probably be low; as I become involved with more
and more species the numbers will increase.

> This really makes it all easier for you?

Actually, yes.  :)

There's another factor that came into play too.  There are certain standards
for bar codes, and some don't allow letters, some don't allow spaces, etc.
Using a standard that only used 0-9, A-E and hyphens let me produce one of
the shortest barcodes so that I could fit them on the plant labels OK.  
Otherwise I would have had to invest in a new laser printer that could print
a finer resolution.  And of course, small barcodes are more susceptible to
errors, especially when printed on weatherproof labels that stay outdoors.

> Well, so long as it works for you, but it is a little awkward for the buyer 
> because the system isn't evident.  The genus sometimes has letters, 
> sometimes doesn't, and when it does, the letter's not always in the same 
> place.  I'm not complaining, just noting that, to someone who doesn't have 
> the inside scoop, it seems strange. (I've got the scoop and I'm still 
> confused)

So what you're saying is that I need to get the online store up, eh?  ;)


To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement