hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: hum......


That may be the difference between those of us who handle a hundred dormant
plants per year vs. those that deal with a couple of hundred of each of a
hundred species.

As for bark, unless it's a mature specimen, bark is pretty much meaningless
to me, unless it has prominent lenticels or something. Maybe I'm missing
something, but juvenile bark is mostly smooth, with the difference in bud
placement (easier to say than to photograph) and bark color, which rarely
seems to come out right in photos anyway.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Donna" <justme@prairieinet.net>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: [CHAT] hum......

> Hi Daryl, (and all)
> I was taking pictures of leafs... as in both sides, along with stems.
> (of course depending on what kinda plant it is)  My friend thought I
> just needed one picture with the whole shootin' match... not enough
> detail in my opinion. I personally have to see the leaf to figure it
> out.

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement