hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Pam - water

I tried to send the following article to Pam re water rights in TX but
it was returned. Sorry to bother the rest of you with this lonish piece
from the NYT. Just skip to the next message if not interested.


Pam, Thought this article might be of interest to you.

ALPINE, Tex.  Angry West Texans and some state officials are demanding a halt 
to a deal that allows a group of politically well-connected Midland oilmen to 
tap the desert and sell billions of gallons of water from the state's public 

The venture was advancing without announcement or competitive bidding by the 
powerful Texas General Land Office, which controls 20 million acres of public 
lands and the liquids and minerals beneath them.

The agency has never licensed private sale of its water. The eight-man water 
partnership, Rio Nuevo Ltd., seeks to be the first, pumping out and selling some 
16 billion gallons a year to municipalities and ranchers in drought-parched far 
west Texas, where many people fear that their own wells could go dry as a 

Since last year, people involved in the matter say, the land office  steward of 
a nearly $18 billion permanent school fund to benefit public education  has 
given an exclusive hearing to Rio Nuevo, prodded by the speaker of the Texas 
House, Tom Craddick, Republican of Midland.

The proposed deal has raised a ruckus in this remote town of 6,000 and its Big 
Bend country sister communities Marfa and Marathon. Since the news leaked out 
two months ago, lawmakers and others have called on the land commissioner, Jerry 
Patterson, to avoid any action pending further examination.

Adding to the furor are accounts that Rio Nuevo sought to deliver its water by 
sending it down the Rio Grande  a plan the state's agriculture commissioner 
called "cockamamie"  and to pay the state 20 cents an acre for water rights to 
646,548 acres in six counties, a yield to the schools of about $129,000.

The company now disavows that figure. The proposed scope was cut to 355,380 
acres in four counties at fees Rio Nuevo now says would yield the schools about 
$7 million a year.

The company also says it plans to invest $350 million in water pipes and pumps. 
Who would buy the water and at what cost is not yet clear, though a likely 
customer could be the City of El Paso. But Adrian Ocegueda, a spokesman for 
Mayor Joe Wardy of El Paso, said that studies of the impact on the water level 
should precede any deal.

A bipartisan State Senate subcommittee was formed to look into the matter, its 
five members writing Commissioner Patterson that "concerns remain about the lack 
of a formal process by which this, and any future proposals, will be evaluated 
and decided upon."

Mr. Patterson and Rio Nuevo representatives sat through a heated meeting with 
500 residents in this Brewster County seat on Dec. 2 and said a 90-day public 
comment period would precede any action.

At the meeting, John King, superintendent of Big Bend National Park, warned that 
the water plan "could cause irreparable harm." A shortage of water outside the 
800,000-acre park, Mr. King said after the meeting, could send wildlife 
streaming into it, disrupting a delicate balance.

Mayor Oscar Martinez of Marfa said he had seen several springs go dry. The water 
deal, he said, should "not even be contemplated."

By Texas law, unless a water district has been formed, landowners control the 
water beneath their property and can draw it out even if that depletes a 
neighbor's supply. This is known as the rule of capture, or "the biggest pump 

Asked why the talks with Rio Nuevo had not been announced at the time, Mr. 
Patterson said, "We don't announce a lot of things under consideration." He 
confirmed that discussions about the lease had been held out of the public eye 
by the three-member board on which he sits. "We were cautious," he said. "We had 
never done this before."

The water deal has the region on edge. It has set Mr. Patterson, a former state 
senator, against the agriculture commissioner, Susan Combs, a rancher and fellow 
Republican who said Rio Nuevo's plan grew out of a "cockamamie idea"  sending 
water down the Rio Grande, where much of it could evaporate.

Though big oil entrepreneurs, including T. Boone Pickens, have bought 
water-mining rights from public conservation districts and private land owners, 
the state has never opened its water to commercial marketing. But growing demand 
requires such sales, Mr. Patterson said. He said he would also consider sales of 
water under prisons, parks and other state property, just as the land office now 
leases rights to oil, gas, minerals and wind power.

"The big question, the only question, is how much water is there, is there 
enough to export without doing harm to the local community?" Mr. Patterson said 
at the Alpine meeting. But Mr. Patterson and Rio Nuevo said they could afford to 
survey the supply only after a lease was signed. Mr. Patterson also said the 
land office lacked the money to mine and sell the water itself, though it is 
preparing to buy a water mining and sales business in Central Texas.

He said that because the land office had no track record for letting a water 
contract, the first one would have to be awarded without bidding.

Local people have turned out in record numbers to protest. "We're already taking 
more than the skies are putting back," said Tom Beard, a rancher who heads the 
Far West Texas Regional Water Planning Group. "The only reason they got this 
far," Mr. Beard said of Rio Nuevo, "is they're very politically plugged in."

An analysis by Texans for Public Justice, a watchdog group, shows that six Rio 
Nuevo partners gave a total of $83,136 to Republican state candidates in 2001 
and 2002  the bulk of it, $72,886, from Gary Martin, an oil investor and 

Mr. Martin declined to answer questions.

Another partner, Roger Abel, a retired president of the Occidental Oil and Gas 
Corporation, said the project would prove publicly beneficial, taking water 
"from Texas for Texans" over a wide area. 

A third partner is Steve Smith of Austin, founder of Excel Communications, who 
spent about $4 million buying the hamlet of Lajitas near Big Bend in 2000 and 
who has invested some $60 million more to make it a luxury resort. Mr. Smith did 
not return a call but Mr. Abel said he was responding on his behalf.

Other Rio Nuevo partners include Kyle McDonnold, a Midland lawyer, and four 
partners in a Midland oil exploration company called Falcon Bay Energy: Mike 
Ford, Anthony Sam, Robert Canon and Steve Cole.

Mr. Canon said that before he and Mr. Cole founded Rio Nuevo, another Midland 
company, Mexco Energy, had bought an interest in a Falcon Bay oil and gas 
projects. Mr. Craddick, the House speaker, is a Mexico director, but Mr. Canon 
said that Falcon Bay and Rio Nuevo were separate entities and that Mr. Craddick 
had nothing to do with Rio Nuevo.

Mr. Craddick, too, said through a spokesman that he had no connection with Rio 
Nuevo. But he did not dispute accounts that he had urged Mr. Patterson and David 
Dewhurst, the land commissioner at the time and now the state's lieutenant 
governor, to meet with Rio Nuevo partners.

Ms. Combs, the agriculture commissioner, said that around April 2002, Mr. Martin 
approached her with an idea of marketing state water via the Rio Grande. It was 
folly, she said, because sending water into the river would entail large losses 
from evaporation.

Not long afterward and at the behest of Mr. Craddick, Mr. Dewhurst said, he met 
with Mr. Martin to discuss the project. Mr. Dewhurst, who was running for 
lieutenant governor, said he later returned a contribution from Mr. Martin when 
he learned the oilman had an issue pending before him as land commissioner. "I 
thought it was a terrible idea," Mr. Dewhurst said of the proposal.

Mr. Patterson said that at Mr. Craddick's urging, he, too, began meeting with 
the Rio Nuevo partners, even before he succeeded Mr. Dewhurst in January.

Then, in May, as the legislative session wound down, the Texas House and Senate 
passed a bill that would allow the Rio Grande watermaster to put into the river 
"privately owned water" for delivery to clients and directed the state's 
Commission on Environmental Quality "to expedite any application for a permit" 
to carry out the act.

Mr. Dewhurst said he remembered Rio Nuevo's pressing for such a bill, but said 
he did not focus on it during the session. Mr. Craddick's spokesman said the 
speaker had nothing to do with the bill.

Val Clark Beard, the county judge of Brewster County and its top-ranking 
official, was skeptical. "It was widely perceived as the speaker's bill," she 
said. "Unusual things get done at the end of the session."

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement