hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Fw: We are so sorry to announce ......


> Marg,
> I totally agree with every point you make!! & was a member of RHS for
> several years-using the discounts offered to great advantage!I would like
to
> add that the other 2 summer shows _Hampton Court & Tatton Park are also
> excellent--& the  seasonal county show are just so much fun!! You can't
> imagine the vegs...wish I had a slide scanner The RHS can do no wrong IMO
&
> horticulture is a very respected profession in the UK..I will rejoin this
> year if I am able to travel
> SAin SA---NOW about 32 degrees!!!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Marge Talt <mtalt@HORT.NET>
> To: <AHS_GARDENING@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:17 AM
> Subject: Re: We are so sorry to announce ......
>
>
> > Well, Kitty, I've been a member of RHS since about '85 and AHS for
> > about as long or maybe a bit longer.
> >
> > I find the RHS 'The Garden' worth every penny of the membership fee;
> > it is an excellent publication and has been for many, many years.
> > Their website improves with every iteration and provides a lot of
> > great information without requiring a password - it is available to
> > everyone and their goal is to put even more of their resources online
> > for the benefit of the entire horticultural world.
> >
> > RHS is a society devoted to plants.  They have one of the greatest
> > (if not 'the' greatest) horticultural libraries in the world and any
> > member, located anywhere can ask for and receive information about
> > plant related issues and receive answers from their scientific staff.
> >  They publish, among other things, the Plant Finder, which, if not
> > useful in locating plants for us in the US, still provides the most
> > update nomenclature resource for genera, species and cultivars
> > available in one spot - AHS ought to be doing this for us in the US,
> > but is not.
> >
> > RHS encourages the national collection scheme - something sadly
> > lacking in the US and which AHS ought to be working on, but is not as
> > far as I can tell.   If we are so lucky as to be able to take a trip
> > to the UK, there are splendid RHS gardens all over the country to
> > visit and major garden shows in spring, summer and autumn.  Chelsea
> > garden show is worth making an effort to see; it is one of a kind;
> > absolutely nothing in the US even comes close.  I may be in error,
> > but do not think AHS sponsors any garden shows and the only garden
> > they maintain is the one around the headquarters and it, while
> > pleasant, is not really worth a lot of trouble to go see....it should
> > be so much better as the show garden of our national horticultural
> > organization.  The garden at J. Raulston Arboretum in Raleigh, while
> > small and young, is much more interesting from a plant standpoint as
> > well as a planting standpoint.
> >
> > In contrast, while 'The American Gardener'  does keep improving, it
> > has a very long way to go to catch up with 'The Garden'.  The AHS
> > site, which is an improvement on the initial one, has dead links to
> > its FAQ page, what's new and its site map - you get a 404 not found
> > on this server error.  I have not found any actual information about
> > plants; there might be something on the members only page, but it is
> > not accessible - will not accept this year's new password (an idea
> > that is really dumb in the first place IMO).  About the only really
> > useful information on the site is the link list and its got dead
> > links and is fairly limited compared to a lot of other garden link
> > lists on the web.  AHS, as far as I can see, is not, primarily, an
> > organization devoted to plants - it appears to be more interested in
> > "programs".
> >
> > I invite a web site comparison:
> >
> > AHS  http://www.ahs.org/index.html
> > RHS http://www.rhs.org.uk/
> >
> > Now, admittedly, RHS has been going longer (over 100 years) and has
> > more members (over 200 thousand world-wide) and more resources, but I
> > also think it has a focus that is more useful to gardeners...namely
> > plants.... plants don't care what country researches, grows or writes
> > about them and, if the information is excellent, neither do I:-)
> >
> > I have noticed in recent issues, articles about US gardens and/or
> > plants, as well, as they have a large US membership...so it's not
> > solely UK focused.  There have been excellent articles about South
> > African plants as well as other nations.  We grow plants in our
> > gardens from all over the world and detailed information about them
> > is always useful.  I found out about the reclassification of
> > Cimicifuga to Actea in 'The Garden' from an article written by one of
> > the team who did the research...the article included the new clad for
> > the genus among other information of a depth I have never seen in any
> > article in 'The American Gardener'.
> >
> > I am not sure what benefits AHS offers that RHS does not offer.  The
> > seed RHS seed exchange used to be fantastic (before the US seed phyto
> > stuff went into effect; now, thanks to our USDA,  it costs US members
> > when it used to be free, but it's still a marvelous list).  I have
> > quite a few plants in my garden started from RHS seed.
> >
> > The email list was really the only 'benefit' that AHS offered (other
> > than the mag) that I can use (I, too, have no use for expensive trips
> > to assorted meetings that do not focus on plants) and the list is
> > being dropped as it is not considered important to the society.  The
> > seeds offered in the small exchange list are very mundane and I
> > either grow them or don't want to. I once spent a lot of time
> > gathering, cleaning and labeling a large assortment of seed and sent
> > it in to that exchange to find it was not listed, and my donation was
> > not acknowledged, so that ended my participation in that exchange
> > from the donor standpoint.
> >
> > I have maintained my AHS membership because I felt I should support
> > our US national hort. organization; not because it was of extreme
> > value compared to RHS.  If I had to choose, I'd keep RHS; no contest.
> >
> > In all the years I've paid my AHS dues, I've never gotten a WFF $20
> > gift. The dues for AHS cost me $45US a year, only slightly less than
> > RHS with the exchange rate.
> >
> > Now, after my little rant, my question is how did you get such a
> > break on your membership fee for AHS?
> >
> > Marge Talt, zone 7 Maryland
> > mtalt@hort.net
> > Editor:  Gardening in Shade
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > Current Article: Wild, Wonderful Aroids Part 3 - Amorphophallus
> > http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/shade_gardening
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > Complete Index of Articles by Category and Date
> > http://mtalt.hort.net/article-index.html
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > All Suite101.com garden topics :
> > http://www.suite101.com/topics.cfm/635
> >
> > ----------
> > > From: Kitty <kmrsy@earthlink.net>
> > >
> > > Libby,
> > >
> > > Re>> I did appreciate having a benefit I actually used (I am not a
> > phone person so the hotline has less appeal, plus it doesn't provide
> > multiple opinions/experiences or discussion)<<
> > >
> > > You definitely raise a valid point.  I subscribed to RHS one year,
> > but had to quit because all benefits, save the magazine and seed
> > exchange, were only available overseas.  With AHS, I only benefit
> > from the magazine and seed exchange, and GIS, becuase I do not
> > travel.  Some of us cannot afford to attend symposiums at Riverfarm
> > that involve hotel stays at $150 a night.  Or group trips to gardens
> > of Eden off the coast of anywhere.  However, I  think the $15/yr
> > membership to AHS is worthwhile for the benefits of which I can avail
> > myself.  (That's $15 after subtracting the $20 WFF gift) Were it a
> > flat $35, with no gift, I don't think I could justify it.
> > >
> > > Kitty

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement