hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

RE: medicare

Like, for example, Totally!

Zone 7 - West TN

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gardenchat@hort.net [mailto:owner-gardenchat@hort.net] On
Behalf Of james singer
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:13 AM
To: gardenchat@hort.net
Subject: Re: [CHAT] medicare

You betcha! [The "forward" part, I mean.]

On Jan 19, 2006, at 10:57 AM, kmrsy@netzero.net wrote:

> Recently some of you on the list said you were slogging through the 
> new medicare choices. I received the following explanation from 
> someone when it first came out but deleted it. I'm glad to say that my

> sister just sent it to me again and I thought it might be of some help

> to you.
> Kitty
>>> President Bush Explains Medicare Drug Bill > >
>>> WOMAN IN AUDIENCE: "I don't really understand. How is the new plan
>>> going to fix the problem?"
>>> PRESIDENT BUSH: (Verbatim response) > > "Because the -- all which is
> on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how 
> benefits are calculated, for example, is on the table. Whether or not 
> benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a 
> series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you

> couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing

> those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been 
> promised more likely to be -- or closer delivered to that has been 
> promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look,

> there's a series
> of things that cause the -- like, for example, benefits are calculated
> based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of
> Some have suggested that we calculate -- the benefits will rise based
> upon inflation, supposed to wage increases. There is a reform that 
> would
> help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how
> fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those --
> that growth is affected, it will help on the red."
> Forward this to others -- so they, too, can understand...
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the 
Island Jim
Southwest Florida
27.0 N, 82.4 W
Hardiness Zone 10
Heat Zone 10
Minimum 30 F [-1 C]
Maximum 100 F [38 C]

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement