hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive


Yer killin' me - what a "dam" riot!

On 7/12/05, Hollikft@aol.com <Hollikft@aol.com> wrote:
> OMG!!!!!!!!!!!  That is so funny!   I am laughing so hard I  cant believe
> this!!   ROTFLOL!!!!!!!!!
> Thanks for sharing this!
> Holli
> LI, NY
> In a message dated 7/12/2005 1:49:01 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> 4042N15@nationalhearing.com writes:
> You may  have seen this already - I think I did a long while back - but it's
> so
> darned funny, it is worth rereading:
> Read the whole thing! This  is supposedly an actual
> letter sent to a man named Ryan DeVries by the  Michigan Department of
> Environmental Quality, State of    Michigan. This guy's response is
> hilarious, but read the State's letter  before you get to the response letter
> SUBJECT: DEQ File   No. 97-59-0023; T11N;  R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County
> Dear Mr. DeVries:
> It has come to the  attention of the Department of Environmental Quality
> that there has been  recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced
> parcel of property.  You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or
> contractor who did  the following unauthorized activity: Construction and
> maintenance of two  wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring
> Pond.
> A permit  must be issued prior to the start of this type of activity. A
> review of the  Department's files shows that no permits have been issued.
> Therefore, the  Department has determined that this activity is in
> violation Part 301,  Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and
> Environmental  Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being
> sections  324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
> The  Department has been informed that one or both of the dams partially
> failed  during a recent rain event, causing debris and flooding at
> downstream  locations. We find that dams of this nature are inherently
> hazardous and  cannot be permitted. The Department therefore orders you to
> cease and  desist all activities at this location, and to restore the
> stream to a  free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming
> the dams from  the stream channel. All restoration work shall be completed
> no later than  January 31, 2003.
> Please notify this office when the restoration has  been completed, so
> that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our  staff.
> Failure to comply with this request or any further  unauthorized
> activity on the site may result in this case being referred  for elevated
> enforcement action. We anticipate and would appreciate your  full
> cooperation in this matter. Please feel free to contact me at this  office
> if you have any questions.
> Sincerely,
> David L.  Price
> District Representative
> Land and Water   Management  Division
> ** This is the actual response sent back:  **
> Re: DEQ File No.   97-59-0023; T11N ; R10W, Sec. 20;  Montcalm County.
> Dear Mr. Price:
> Your certified letter dated  12/17/02 has been handed to me to respond
> to. I am the legal landowner but  not the Contractor at 2088 Dagget,
> Pierson, Michigan. A couple of beavers  are in the (State unauthorized)
> process of constructing and maintaining two  wood "debris" dams across the
> outlet stream of my Spring Pond.
> While  I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise their dam project, I
> think they  would be highly offended that you call their skillful use of
> natures  building materials "debris." I would like to challenge your
> department to  attempt to emulate their dam project any time and/or any
> place you choose.  I believe I can safely state there is no way you could
> ever match their dam  skills, their dam  resourcefulness, their dam
> ingenuity, their dam  persistence, their dam determination and/or their
> dam work ethic.
> As  to your request, I do not think the beavers are aware that they must
> first  fill out a dam permit prior to the start of this type of  dam
> activity.
> My first dam question to you is: (1) Are you trying to  discriminate
> against my Spring Pond Beavers or (2) do you require all  beavers
> throughout this State to conform to said dam request?? If you are  not
> discriminating against these particular beavers, through the Freedom  of
> Information Act, I request completed copies of  all those other  applicable
> beaver dam permits that have been issued. Perhaps we will see if  there
> really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of  the
> Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the  Public
> Acts of 1994, being sections 324 .30101 to 324.30113 of the  Michigan
> Compiled Laws, annotated.
> I have several concerns. My first  concern is .. aren't the beavers
> entitled to legal representation? The  Spring Pond Beavers are financially
> destitute and are unable to pay for  said representation, so the State
> will have to provide them with a dam  lawyer. The Department's dam concern
> that either one or both of the dams  failed during a recent rain event
> causing flooding is proof that this is a  natural occurrence, which the
> Department is required to protect. In other  words, we should leave the
> Spring Pond Beavers alone rather than  harassing  them and calling their
> dam names.
> If you want  the   stream "restored" to a dam free-flow condition  please
> contact the beavers, but if you are going to arrest them, they  obviously
> did not pay any attention to your dam letter...they being unable  to read
> English.
> In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have  a right to build
> their unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the  grass is green
> and water flows downstream. They have more dam rights than I  do to live
> and enjoy Spring Pond. If the Department of Natural Resources  and
> Environmental Protection lives up to its name, it should protect  the
> natural resources (Beavers) and the environment   (Beavers'  Dams).
> So, as far as the   beavers and I are concerned, this  dam case can be
> referred for more elevated enforcement action right now.  Why wait until
> 12/31/2003? The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the dam ice  then and
> there will be no way for you or your dam staff to contact/harass  them
> then.
> In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention to  a real
> environmental quality (health) problem in the area. It is the  bears!
> Bears are actually defecating in our woods.? I definitely believe  you
> should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave the beavers  alone.
> If you are going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your step!  (The
> bears are not careful where they dump!)
> Being  unable to comply with your dam request, and being unable to
> contact you on  your dam answering machine, I am sending this response to
> your dam  office.
> Thank You,
> Ryan DeVries & The Dam  Beavers
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Pam Evans
Kemp TX
zone 8A

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement