hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Emily & teaching Science, or not

Where science is concerned, we have to differentiate between  
hypothesis/theory and proof/fact. The Galileo controversy was  
complex, but focused on the perceived contradiction between the  
heliocentric theory and scripture. Cardinal Bellarmine (ok, Jim,  
another Jesuit) wrote to an ally of Galileo, "I say that if real  
proof be found that the sun is fixed and does not revolve around the  
earth, but the earth around the sun, then it will be necessary, very  
carefully, to proceed to the explanation of the passages of Scripture  
which appear to be contrary, and we should rather say we have  
misunderstood these than pronounce that to be false which is  

Cathy, west central IL, z5b

On Jul 16, 2005, at 10:47 PM, Christopher P. Lindsey wrote:

>> science cannot coexist w/ religion.   Who's to say the Big Bang  
>> wasn't
>> merely God snapping his (or her) fingers saying OK, the universe  
>> comes
>> into being now?   Science merely explains the natural universe  and
>> its forces which were ultimately created by a Divine will.   They
>> don't have to be in different camps.   The 6000 year theory was
>> obviously dreamed up by someone who knew nothing of carbon dating.
>> But people w/ bizarre and myopic attitudes exist in all walks of  
>> life.
>> More's the pity....
> I remember reading an article a few years back where scientists  
> thought
> they might have determined that time wasn't a constant -- the further
> and further you went from the center of the Big Bang, the slower time
> went.
> The creationists were all thrilled.  They said that this meant both  
> camps
> were right -- dinosaurs were around millions of years ago, but only  
> because
> TIME WAS FASTER THEN.  They claimed that if time had been constant it
> would've only been 6000 years or whatever.
> Personally, I doubt most stuff from the church.  I mean, it took  
> until 1992
> for them to pardon Galileo for saying that the Earth revolved  
> around the
> sun!  I guess I believe in a higher power, but I don't really  
> worship and
> don't acknowledge papal authority.
> Chris
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement