hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: moving buxus

I doubt this one will ever get that big.  NCSU fact sheet says 4 to 5 ft, as
do other sites.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marge Talt" <mtalt@hort.net>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [CHAT] moving buxus

> > From: Kitty <kmrsy@comcast.net>
> > Thanks for the info Marge.  Sounds like my box may have a chance.
> > I referred to it as an "unmaimed" box because I hate it when a box
> is cut
> > into a box or globe shape.  The natural shape is so much nicer.
> ----------
> LOL Kitty.  I thought you'd made a typo trying to write 'unnamed' and
> was teasing you:-)
> I enjoy box both ways.  Clipped box can be very effective if done
> right and in the right spot.  Often it is turned into a lollipop that
> has no relation to anything else in the garden, just because that's
> what the owner can do when they prune.  Not fond of that, myself.
> But, well done, clipped box forms a marvelous background for other
> plantings.  It's also a good subject for topiary, something I enjoy
> in other people's gardens, but not mine.
> Some, esp. some of the dwarfer forms do have the most beautiful
> natural billowy shape.
> B. sempervirens - the species - only looks good left natural when out
> in the middle of a huge area IMO...otherwise it is much better
> clipped.  It gets enormous.  I've seen them 10' tall and the same in
> diameter; it's one of the coarser of the species/cvs out there IMO;
> does not have that billowy look to it.  I have a clipped hedge of
> this as a 'foundation' plant along the kitchen side of our house.
> It's nearly 5' tall and as deep now.  It's not clipped as a formal
> straight sided hedge; thought I could describe it, but 3 tries and
> I'm not getting there, so I give up...but it's clipped.  If I didn't,
> I wouldn't be able to see the house; it would have hit the roof by
> now.
> Marge Talt, zone 7 Maryland
> mtalt@hort.net
> Editor:  Gardening in Shade
> -----------------------------------------------
> Current Article: Battling Bambi
> http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/shade_gardening
> ------------------------------------------------
> Complete Index of Articles by Category and Date
> http://mtalt.hort.net/article-index.html
> ------------------------------------------------
> All Suite101.com garden topics :
> http://www.suite101.com/topics.cfm/635
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
> http://www.hort.net/funds/

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement