hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: Buddleia davidii a noxious weed???

> From: gardenqueen@academicplanet.com
> Like our friend Jesse says folks "repeat after me, People are

Well, Pam, there are a lot of folks out and about who are two bricks
shy of a load and you wonder how they manage to get up; get through
the day and back to bed at night in one piece.

But, when it comes to developers, there is another factor at play. 
MONEY.  Developers build to make money...period.  They have no taste;
they do not care what they do to the environment nor what the end
product looks like (nor what the quality is - it will be as low as
they can get away with; no matter how expensive the house).  They
want to put the maximum number of units on any given piece of ground;
get them up as fast as possible, sell them as fast as possible; get
out and go on to the next lot.

When a developer gets hands on some ground and hires a civil engineer
or land planner to lay out the development, they don't pay one bit of
attention to what the ground actually does in three dimensions nor
what's on it - unless it's wetland or something else they have to
deal with  - they just lay out the maximum number of lots that can be
legally crammed on it.  Developments with 'common space' got that
because it wasn't buildable for some reason OR because with it the
developer could increase the density on the rest of the property. 
It's all about $$$$.

Buyers of what they produce are also governed more by money than
taste...they want the most house they can get for the least amount of
money.   In some cases, it's simply that they can actually afford one
of the ticky-tacky houses and could not get a loan to buy anything

I have maintained for several years that people who buy some of the
tract mansions around here have to sign a paper that states "I am
totally tasteless" before they can even go in to look at the house;
the builders have to do the same before they can file for a permit. 
It's a vast, tasteless conspiracy out there:-)

Marge Talt, zone 7 Maryland
Editor:  Gardening in Shade
Current Article: Battling Bambi
Complete Index of Articles by Category and Date
All Suite101.com garden topics :

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement