hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: Social security overflow, change the law

It has been this way for a very long time.  My Father-in-law retired from
the military (Army, Navy and Air Force during WWII, Korea and various other
conflicts via a few years as a reservist) took a job with the railroad and
retired from there.  Since he was not a Commissioned officer, his service
pension wasn't much and because the government had oversight of the
railroads, there was a conflict between the two and they tried to deny him
any pension for the railroad service at all.  He got a much reduced railroad
pension and had it not been for his wife's SS, I don't think the two of them
could have made it at all.  The ordinary government worker doesn't get that
great a retirement.

To top it off, the veterans used to get their medical care taken care of,
but as my FIL had his last bout with cancer, that changed.  At his age, he
couldn't even get additional insurance to cover the expenses.

Chris, I'm surprised the State doesn't use TIAA/CREF for their employees.
Even though mother only worked part time at a local school, she received
fair benefits (not fabulous, but fair.)  Most who have taught in the public
schools in Indiana or Ohio will have fair retirements due to TIAA/CREF
investment strategies.  Bill will get some for about 12-15 years of service
to an Indiana educational institution.

Did you mother not get any previous notice as to how her retirement would
work out?  Didn't she get SS notices periodically?  I get them every couple
of years.  DH and I aren't depending on any government support because we
are the last of the baby-boomers and don't believe it will be there for us
when we need it or it will be so reduced, it won't help much.  Besides the
squeeze from us baby-boomers, we are all living longer lives.  More people
in the system means less for each individual.

I believe that many models are built on the premise that a retiree's house
will be paid off, there will be only one car that will be paid off, that
working expenses will be greatly diminished and so one will not need much to
live on.  We all know that a perfect outlook such as that is a fantasy.  A
fixed income can't possibly account for all the things that could go wrong
and cost a fortune.

O.K.  I'm off my soapbox now.

Bonnie (SW OH - zone 5)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gardenchat@hort.net [mailto:owner-gardenchat@hort.net] On Behalf
Of Gene Bush
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:17 AM
To: gardenchat@hort.net
Subject: Re: [CHAT] Social security overflow, change the law

Perhaps times are changing...
    I doubt it, but. The general public has always resented public employees
and see them as loaded up on benefits and pay they can not have. Nothing
further from the truth, but ...... Double dipping... retiring from the
military with one pension and still being young enough to retire from
another government job has always been resented and the employees seen as
rich at the public expense.
    I worked for 27 years postal system, 4 years military. When I take SS it
will cut my other retirement to just about nil. I retired out at 30% of my
gross from the postal system. .... 12 years back at $750 a month.  Who can
live on that? and if you add to it you are a rich person who is bankrupting
the country. No dental benefits, I pay half my medical which is mostly a
plan so I will not pay more than $2000 a year from my own pocket.
    Public servants have never been treated well in the US that I am aware
of. Perhaps now that the public's tail has been saved once more at the
expense of public servants lives some good will may last another year or two
until the laws can get changed.
    On a rant here this morning.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pam Evans" <gardenqueen@gmail.com>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:32 AM
Subject: Re: [CHAT] Social security overflow, change the law

> Well that hardly seems fair!    Sheesh.
> On 10/5/06, Christopher P. Lindsey <lindsey@mallorn.com> wrote:
>> I don't know how many people here are affected by this, but the current
>> law states that any government employee who retires with a government
>> pension can only collect about 1/3 of any social security that they would
>> normally receive.
>> For example, my Mom put 15 years into SS and 22 years into SURS (the
>> State University Retirement System).  She can retire from SURS with
>> a small pension (22 years gives her about 40% of her salary), but the
>> 15 years of social security will pay her a whopping 5% of her salary.
>> So after 37 years of secretarial/receptionist work she will receive
>> 45% of her current income, less taxes.
>> Pensioners through private programs can collect from SS and their pension
>> fund; it's only government employees who are penalized.
>> To add insult to injury, if your spouse dies and you're on a government
>> pension, your spouse's social security is also cut.  In my Mom's case,
>> if anything were to happen to my Dad my Mom wouldn't be allowed to
>> collect ANY widower's social security benefits.
>> There's currently a bill out there to change this.  If you think that
>> this is a bad thing (as I do, who will also be affected by this when I
>> retire), visit
>>   http://www.dingomt.com/ssoffsetlaw/
>> for more information.  A sample letter to send to your representative
>> is available at
>>   http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/socialsecurity7
>> Or you can call 1-866-327-8670 and ask for your congressperson's office.
>> Say "As Congressperson _____________'s constituent, I am calling to ask
>> him/her to sign the discharge petition, House Resolution 987, introduced
>> on
>> September 7, to bring the Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 147) to a
>> prompt vote on the House floor."
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> -- 
> Pam Evans
> Kemp TX
> zone 8A
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement