hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: Article from Natchez "Naturalist Newsletter"

Well, I suppose that is the difference between my neighbor's very tidy yard
and my collection of plants with an "undisturbed" area or two around the
back yard.  Ecology is nothing if it is not an interdependency to create a
viable, livable system where the excretion/waste of one thing is the
breath/food of another.  I agree that too much "neatness" ruins what should
come "naturally."

Bonnie (SW OH - zone 5)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gardenchat@hort.net [mailto:owner-gardenchat@hort.net] On Behalf
Of Zemuly@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:49 AM
To: gardenchat@hort.net
Subject: [CHAT] Article from Natchez "Naturalist Newsletter"

I received the following article from our Experiment Station
 Thought you all would find it interesting.
zone 7
West TN
A fellow in the vicinity has been busy this week  bulldozing the trees and 
bushes from a ditch running across his large, flat,  grassy field. Someone 
remarked to me how wonderful it is that "things are  getting cleaned up
here, really looking neat now."

Let it be known  that when it comes to neatening up the landscape for 
neatness' sake, what I see  is habitat destruction, and there's nothing neat
about it.

Above I use  the word "abomination" advisedly. I am aware of the word's 
religious  connotations, for many of us never see that word except in the
where many  things are classed as "abominations before the Lord." I use the
not in a  religious context, but in a spiritual one, and in my opinion the 
destruction of  life-giving habitat purely for the sake of appealing to the 
local community's  concept of "neatness" is abomination before the spirit of

For, when you look into the Universe and at the web of life on  our little 
Earth, you see plainly that the Creator blossoms diversity out of
evolves sophistication out of awkwardness, and leaves strands of  
interdependency among all things. Whatever in
spirit goes against this grand  and beautiful theme of the Creator is 

The bushes and trees  along that little ditch across the field provided a 
tiny island of habitat for a  gorgeous diversity of living beings. A
local ecosystem of mutually  dependent living things existed in an ocean of 
ecologically unstable monoculture  grass. It was a polyphonic song sung in a

desert. And its destruction for the  sake of neatening up the
landscape is an  abomination.

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement