hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Does anyone use bap 10 anymore?

  • Subject: Re: Does anyone use bap 10 anymore?
  • From: HoroRL@aol.com
  • Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 19:02:22 EDT

Hi, all:

One of the big agrochemical company's (Novartis, Monsanto, Dow-Elanco, ?) is 
coming out with BAP and a root auxin, could be IBA or NAA. All in one.

I believe that Jim Anderson has mentioned that using BAP causes the dormant 
axial buds to develop BUT it also causes the biochemistry to change in that 
affected tissue which prevents the generation of root development. (Jim, 
excuse my hack explanation...I think that it's close.) 


Rich Horowitz
Stoughton MA
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index