hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: naming plants

  • Subject: Re: naming plants
  • From: Jim Hawes <hawesj@atlantic.net>
  • Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 13:26:14 -0400


Thank you for your reply. I appreciate that you may consider that you have a
problem when differing opinions are sent to you to suggest differing names for
plants under discussion. I would look on this as an opportunity to resolve the
tfferences of opinion to arrive at a "closer to truth" answer to the differenct
views. It doesn't necessarily have to be a big  pain in the rear.  If,  for
example, you have a plant named 'Hokuryu' in the library( which you do) , and I
present the notion that it is misspelled...that the correct spelling is 'Kokuryu',
and I present evidence that I have this plant, that I obtained it from Toyozo
Nakayama in Japan on a trade on such and such a date, that my label is clear and
legible, that  he informs me that this plant was collected in the wild by Mr.
Kurasawa , that it is a H. rectifolia selection, that it has a red flower, that
only two other people have it...Pete Ruh and Van Wade, as well as other convincing
information about this plant, you are most likely to believe me instead of someone
else who does not have such evidence or information. Resolution of differences of
opinion can become interesting topics of discussion on Hosta-open  which can be
very educational. Any conflict which arises can even be positive in helping us
remember the correct spelling of this hostas as well as some of its history and its
characteristics. . It is really not your responsibility to resolve these name
issues. I think you should make changes in names only in cases where there is
concensus regarding new facts and/or  clear evidence is presented by  many
knowledgeable people of what are the facts and what is mere opinion.

So be happy that the Hosta Library and its work in updating or making corrections
can serve as a very positive excercise in learning more about hostas.


bob wrote:

> Thanks Jim
>         If I were to get my wish I would like a group of knowledgeble people to
> get together and decide what the names and anything else they deem
> necessary for library info and I would be more than happy to add it. On
> some plants someone tells me it should be named something and sometime
> down the road someone writes and says that isn't correct and I should
> rename or move a plant to a different section. Then someone else wants
> me to move it back. Big pain in the rear.
> Thanks
> Bye
> Bob
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index