hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Fw: NYTimes.com Article: The Irradiation of Mail Can Also Zap the Contents

  • Subject: Fw: NYTimes.com Article: The Irradiation of Mail Can Also Zap the Contents
  • From: "Jack Hirsch" <naylorck@olypen.com>
  • Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 17:09:54 -0800

Thought some might be interested in this...
Gary & Jack
Naylor Creek Nursery

>The Irradiation of Mail Can Also Zap the Contents
>January 11, 2002
>Attempts by the United States Postal Service to make mail
>safer by zapping it with radiation have hit a snag: the
>process tends to destroy computer chips and to damage other
>delicate items including food, pharmaceuticals, clothing,
>contact lenses - and even the paper mail itself.
>"The irradiation process, as I understand it, generates
>heat, and that's the killer," said Bob Anderson, a
>spokesman for the Postal Service, in response to questions
>about the problem.
>That, of course, was the original idea: killing anthrax
>spores like the ones that were mailed to Congressional
>offices and to news media companies. In response, the
>Postal Service began to put mail to federal recipients and
>to some media companies through sterilizing machines.
>The Postal Service is currently trucking mail to be
>sanitized to temporary processing centers in Ohio and New
>Jersey, and has bought eight irradiation machines from the
>Titan Corporation (news/quote) of La Jolla, Calif., for $5
>million each. The machinery exposes the mail to potent
>beams of electrons - a technology that, on a less intense
>level, can be used to sanitize food.
>But something powerful enough to destroy hardy anthrax
>spores plays havoc with less hardy objects. Staff members
>in federal offices in Washington say that paper mail
>deteriorates under the treatment and that photographs are
>ruined: the mail, some of which has been delayed for months
>because of the anthrax worries, is "much like letters that
>were set aside and buried under a pile in someone's garage
>for three years," a Congressional aide said. Some of the
>mail in New Jersey has caught fire.
>This week the CompactFlash Association, which represents
>makers of memory cards used in digital cameras, personal
>computers and portable music players, warned that the beams
>"will not only cause loss of data stored on the cards, but
>the cards will no longer be operable."
>A spokesman for the association, Bill Frank, said other
>chips are also affected. "We've done some tests and this
>destroys the stuff," he said.
>Bill Calder, a spokesman for the chip maker Intel
>(news/quote), confirmed that many kinds of chips were at
>risk. "They're not wrong to say semiconductors could
>potentially be damaged," he said.
>That is not much of a problem right now, said Mr. Anderson
>of the Postal Service, because the scope of the federal
>mail-sanitizing program is currently limited to federal
>offices and some media companies. "It's really a nonissue,
>because Aunt Millie is not going to get her mail
>irradiated," he said, adding that the attacks were focused
>and so "our response is targeted" as well.
>Mr. Anderson said the Postal Service had called together a
>working group from affected industries - including shippers
>of high-technology goods, drugs, clothing and food - to
>test products and try to establish procedures for
>identifying mail that can be damaged by the beams, and to
>help those companies avoid the process.
>"We don't want to fry the mail," Mr. Anderson said. "That
>doesn't serve our customers." He said that the goal of the
>Postal Service was to deliver the mail "as safely and as
>economically as possible."
>A spokesman for Titan, Wil Williams, said the company had
>made the destructive potential of its technology clear to
>the Postal Service. The mass mailing and catalog companies,
>he said, already use presorting procedures that generally
>keep their mail from going through the sterilizing system.
>Paper tested by his company was not damaged, Mr. Williams
>said, but he added that the intense effort to sanitize so
>much mail could lead to varying results. "Every new process
>that we're doing that comes along, you have to take the
>nicks out of it and make it efficient," he said.
>Ultimately, the problems with mail-sanitizing technology
>may be diminishing in importance because of another mail
>technology, said David Carle, a spokesman for Senator
>Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont. "Senator Leahy and
>his staff," he said, "noticed that a threshold was crossed
>in April of last year, when for the first time e-mail
>surpassed postal mail in volume. That process has been
>accelerated since the anthrax problem."
>For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
>or other creative advertising opportunities with The
>New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
>Racer at alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media
>kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo
>For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
>Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index