hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Size of Hostas

Meum71@aol.com wrote:
....I also think that small, medium, large or what ever...
> Has more to do with height than spread. 
I am always intrested in perception , when this size question comes up. 
Although many gardeners agree that the height is the determinant, most
nurserymen and designers would argue, that as a primary measurement, the
way to categorize any plant is by the greatest dimention first.  In
almost all Hostas , that would be spread.  This also is in accordance
with the US standards for measuring plants.  Although the US standards
apply primirarly to "structural" plants like evergreen shrubs, it is
hard to make the arguemant that Hostas do not fit this catagory.  Since,
height is seldom critical in most garden settings, but the 'space'
needed to grow them , is, we need to first focus on ultimate spread as
the primary consideration.  Just my view here.
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index