hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: longipes Urajiro Hatchijo


>And then to know based on my DNA research that the plant is 
>neither a longipes nor a rupifraga but a hybrid!

What kind of DNA research did you use to prove this plant was a 
hybrid?  I would be interested in knowing what techniques you use. Do 
the seeds from this plant germinate with a cotyledon or a true leaf?  
You have yet to provide any pertinent quotes from the book that you 
claim supports your view, so how are we to believe your statement that 
this hosta is a hybrid just because you say so.  

>I hate it, to say it mildly, that again my credibility is questioned.

Ben, your credibility is questioned because you make bold statements 
that you expect us to accept without any proof from you.  You still 
refuse to provide any proof for your views on hosta cotyledons, so how 
are we to accept your lastest claims.  Fill us in on some of the 
details you use.  All you say is "based on my DNA research," but that 
doesn't say anything.  

>I have measured DNA more than a thousand times in Hosta The figures 
>are correct within 1-2% So there is no doubt in my mind.

No doubt in your mind about what?  

>I cannot convince some of you, no matter what I say.

That is because a lot of what you say and write is based on bad 
science and you don't give good proof for what you claim.  You made 
some claims about hosta cotyledons, but yet you rfuse to provide any 
quotes from the books that you claim supports your view.  If you are 
going to make some claims back it up with some data and give us an 
idea of the techniques you use.  

>But again I only meet distrust.

Ben, you meet distrust because you have written some Hosta Journal 
articles that were full of errors based on bad science and then you 
made some claims about hosta cotyledons and you claim a book supports 
your view, but yet you refuse to quote the pertinent passages.  And 
now you make a statement that a certain hosta is a hybrid based on 
your "DNA research."  What kind of DNA research?

Joe Halinar

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index