hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Disgusted

Hell, once I get started, I might as well disagree with everyone.  Maybe I'm
just feeling contrary today.

Before we start looking for solutions, what is the problem?  If I offer to sell
you Satisfaction and Bob Solberg offers to sell you Tyler's Treasure, and both
of us tell you that it is a green centered form of Piedmont Gold, if you buy
them both then you deserve to be parted with your money.  So assuming that we're
all honest with each other, you will only buy one, probably based on price or
who you like to deal with, or something.  Just because a plant is offered to you
doesn't mean you should buy it, and if you know enough not to buy every plant
that is registered, where is the problem?

When we start nominating people to decide for us which hostas we should have, I
think we are going to cause more problems than we solve.   For the most part the
differences are very subjective, primarily apperance.  It's not like very many
are weak growers, invasive pests, more subject to disease or have any of the
other characteristics you might use to judge a tree or shrub.  In most cases you
just think one looks better than another.  So you buy the one you like.  Many of
us have hundreds of different hostas, but I doubt that anyone could name very
many that are "must have and very distinct".  Maybe 25 or 50 that are so good
that if they were taken off the market you couldn't find another you like just
as well.  I doubt that there are that many.

We already have a system of prizes and awards given by the AHS.  And the growers
nominate a plant for hosta of the year.  Does anyone really pay any attention to
them when they decide whether they want to buy a hosta?  We already have plenty
of criteria to make a choice.  Who's the breeder? Who's the seller? What to
others say about it.  Most important, what's it look like?  If anyone is
including whether the plant is registered in these criteria, then they don't
understand the process.


timsaville wrote:

> Hi Roy/Dan
> Can I put a foot in both camps?
> Let's leave the registration process as it is AND
> start an award category  of Hosta (Must HAVE-Hosta Award of Very Distinct)
> very similar to the RHS AGM system (Award of Garden Merit) where trials of a
> Genus produce the winners. Of course the State's geography doesn't help this
> type of exercise and maybe the Hosta Library's "comments section" is a
> better starting point for unsure hosta purchasers.
> Tim over the pond
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roy M. Dales"
> > I could not agree more with the basic premiss of this message, however, I
> > seem to get stuck when it comes to ways of correcting the situation.
> >
> > Any ideas out there?  Maybe we should start a Hosta Hall of Fame.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index