hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Disgusted

  • Subject: Re: Disgusted
  • From: CCREDUX@aol.com
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 23:19:40 EDT

In a message dated 5/15/2001 12:42:43 PM Central Daylight Time,
mike.groothuis@arsadvertising.com writes:


The old stand-by of
"distinct from 20 feet or so" should really be stressed more, now that there
are so many new varieties being registered and sold.



How many of such are there? I'd guess about 100 or so.
What is your estimate?

Clyde Crockett z5 ccredux@aol.com




 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index