hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: election - delete if not interested

I hope I don't get in trouble for my opinion here.  It seems there are a lot
of Americans who simply can't get beyond the sex issue with clinton.  I
would not try to change anyones mind about anything because it has been
proven that this is a waste of time.  It is only through education the truth
can come to light.  In the clinton case, it is extremely difficult because
for some mysterious reason those that choose to support him take punishment
for their involvement in wrong doings that also involved the clintons, they
choose not to place any blame on the clintons.  Think of it, all these
people are guilty and have received some sort of sentence or punishment but
the clintons are lily white?  Do you really believe these people, not the
clintons,  are the brains behind these schemes?  Is it being murdered they
are afraid of?  Is it the IRS?  How many on the robin have seen the body
count of people affiliated with the clinton rise to power?  It is not about
the sex.
Best Regards, Beth
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chick" <chick@bridgewoodgardens.com>
To: <hosta-open@mallorn.com>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: election - delete if not interested

> ShayDguy@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > The answer to this is to look at history:
> >
> > Eisenhower had his "secretary"
> >
> > JFK boffed anything with skirts--in or out of the white house (Maybe
> > why he had a bad back!)
> >
> > Johnson had "friends" all over.
> >
> > etc. etc.
> >
> Betcha Nixon didn't have any girlfriends.
> Wow, just the thought gives me the willies.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index