Re: Election - you should delete this, probably
>If he was a uniter, he would have met with Al buddy PRIOR to the
>final result of this election being discerned, as Al had proposed.
Can you give me one good reason why Bush should meet with Gore? As I
remember it, we had an election and Bush won, by a close count in
Florida. Florida had a recount and Bush won again! Now Gore and his
minions are trying to steal the election from Bush, and they aren't
even being secretive about it. There is no reason for Bush to meet
>I think we'll be turning the clock back 20 years to see lots and lots
>of money being diverted to get us ready to go to war... and running
>the national debt up through the ceiling so that we can be prepared
>for war with the Chinese.
Andrew, have you been diagnosed as being paranoid? You are going way
off the deep end here.
>Al has a lot of weaknesses.
And a sore loser!
>...on initial examination he doesn't have the charisma to be a great
Neither did Lincoln! And he is listed as one of the three great
presidents by historians - Washington, Lincoln and FDR. How a
socialist ever got to be listed as a great president is beyond me, but
FDR did provide good leadership during WW II.
>I believe Al has been very Presidential in his speeches since this
>hotly contested battle became a nightmare
Gore has been nothing but a spolied brat. If he were presidental he
would have conceded after he lost the recount.
>If [Bush] DOES become the next President of the US, and if he has to
>run against Hillary four years later, I think it could be an exciting
Looks like a good possibility AND it would make an interesting race.
Special Request - The digest form of the robin is coming in with an
attachment that is repeated 3 and 4 times, showing up as gibbish.
When replying to a message it is NOT necessary to include all of the
message that you are responding to. Just cut out the pertinent quotes
you want to respond to.
To sign-off this list, send email to email@example.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE HOSTA-OPEN