hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: hybridizing question

Chick, Clyde, Ran et al. ---
Let me jump in with a geneticist's point of view.  I say this admitting
that I have yet to see the results of a hosta cross through my hands.  But
hostas are plants, and I do know a little about how plants work.

Please excuse the quotations.  I think these are needed in this case:
[Clyde said]
> > If S&S is the pod parent, you are most likely to get something that
looks like
> > S&S.
[Chick replied]
> Which brings up the question, Why?  It has also been my experience that
> resemble the pod more than the pollen parent.  If I remember my high
> biology, shouldn't each parent have an equal chance to have it's
> predominate, depending on which genes are dominant or recessive?

Chick, you are correct about the "equal chance" if the only phenomena you
are observing are controlled by nuclear genes.  Remember, this is a hosta:
there are also plastid genes floating around to be considered.  And cell
layers, since the variegated hostas we love are chimerae.  

Characteristics controlled by plastid genes will follow the seed (pod)
parent.  Those controlled by nuclear genes will follow the Mendelian equal
chance (he called it "independent assortment") concept.  

If Gregor Mendel had worked with hosta, he would have never "discovered"

A second thing to consider is that it is very easy to contaminate a
cross-pollination with self-pollen, either by emasculating late, or by not
protecting the exposed stigma after cross-pollination.  Contamination can
really confuse the proportions you see in the seedlings.  To a geneticist
trying to determine inheritance patterns, this is a big problem.  To a
breeder looking for that needle in the haystack, it is not: you simply grow
out more seedlings.  

Finally, if the characteristics you are observing are dominant (or mostly
dominant), then the seedlings should be expected to show those dominant
characters, right?  If S&S contains a group of dominant characteristics,
then you should expect its progeny to show those.  

The gold color in S&S, for instance, may be caused by the August Moon
lethal, which is not a plastid-based color, but is a dominant nuclear gene
which is lethal when homozygous.  If this is true, then 2/3 of the S&S
progeny (from crosses to greens) should be gold, and 1/3 green.  This is
not the normal genetic pattern (1:2:1) because 1/3 of the embryos abort in
the seed or as very young seedlings (that's the effect of the lethal gene).
 This was determined first by Kevin Vaughn and published in an early AHS
Journal (back in the mimeograph days --- maybe #11 or #13).  

Rick G
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index