hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Proxy Voting

Thanks for your non personal and obviously well thought out post.

At 06:48 PM 9/4/99 EDT, you wrote:
>In a message dated 9/4/1999 2:44:23 PM Central Daylight Time, 
>sunkat@excite.com writes:
><< Can anyone explain why we can't vote by proxy? >>
>Hi All,
>I think I have the answer==No one can explain it, because the issue has only 
>recently come up.
>The tradition has been that every important decision that is made in the AHS 
>is controlled by the Board. The members were simply a rubber stamp.This 
>pertains particularly to the election of the officers.
>Actually, up to this point, no one has really cared much about what the
>has done.Reason=it did not affect the members.
>However, with the advent of outrageous, indeed, reckless spending; 
>concentrating power in a few;  the IAC and Preferred Growers Program; the 
>insouciance of the president; the creation of a members-only Robin with a 
>tyrannical governing body---members HAVE, en masse,  become interested and 
>want to have a voice in the decisions that are being made.
>I could be wrong, but I forsee proxy voting will be permitted in the near 
>future.I cannot imagine that the Board would be opposed to such.
>I should not be misunderstood to suggest that proxy voting should be allowed 
>to interfere with orderly procedures.(Such as requiring that all members not 
>in attendance be advised of a particular motion on the floor before a vote
>secured. E.G. , the somewhat archaic motion to accept the minutes of a Board 
>Meeting without their being read.)
>I do think the local and regional societies could make things easier, if 
>before a convention, the members, who are not attending an impending 
>convention, give their proxies to an attending member.
>Also, the AHS should, well in advance of its annual meeting , inform all 
>members of matters to be voted on.
>>From what I have seen and heard, I gather that there is almost a unaimous 
>view that proxy voting should generally be permitted. I'd like to hear any 
>opposing view or views.
>Clyde Crockett 
>To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
Butch Ragland So. Indiana zone 5

"Conflict is as addictive as nicotine, alcohol, drugs, etc.
I'm sorry to report that cooperation is not."
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index