hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: [IGSROBIN] Florescent Lights

Any body who refers to her violets as her girls needs a life.
----- Original Message -----
From: Judith King <Jaking300@AOL.COM>
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 1999 9:04 PM
Subject: Florescent Lights

> Dale,
> I happen to stumble into a lecture on African Violets yesterday and the
> said that her violets did best under 16 hrs. per day of florescents. I
> admit, though, that she had them only inches above her "girls," as she
> them. She said tests had shown that more than that, and they didn't grow
> well. Don't have any idea how this would compare with Pels, but I would
> imagine Pels would take a whole lot more light without problems.
> Thanks for the input on this. Maybe Cindi could start a project on it. : )
> Judith

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index