hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: Need a photo
  • Subject: Re: Re: Need a photo
  • From: Loic Tasquier <tasquierloic@cs.com>
  • Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:17:12 -0400 (EDT)


don't forget the flower was hardly opened, maybe that's why the standards had such a strange shape; i don't remember, it was some years ago


-----Original Message-----
From: Linda Mann <lmann@lock-net.com>
To: iris-photos <iris-photos@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Aug 27, 2013 4:53 pm
Subject: [iris-photos] Re: Need a photo

I'm glad you posted them, Loic. I also thought the comparison with
Beverly Sills was interesting.

Not much difference in the falls, but what a change in the standards! I
didn't know there could be such a difference, just assumed both would
change in a similar way - more surface in the falls = more surface in
the standards and vice versa. But obviously not always true.

Linda Mann

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement