Re: Re: HIST: TB: Pink Opal- use of species designation
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Re: HIST: TB: Pink Opal- use of species designation
- From: Walter Pickett firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 17:25:47 -0800 (PST)
What I wrote a few days ago was based on the assumption that all of a plant's ancesters were actually of the same species, I. pallida in this instance. I was making no claim that this was the case in this instance.
There are different taxonomists who know much more about I. pallida who don't agree among themselves. I am not so familiar with I. pallida and am giving no opinion. Actaully I have no opinion.
Today, and this is not a recent thing necessarily, finding something in the wild doesn't necessarily mean it is a pure species.
And experts differ in the definations of pure species. It is important to keep records and type specimums if one is going to call a garden hybrid by a species name.
It would also be good to keep such records of wild-collected clones. Neither wild nor gardenbred means species or non-species.
A possible case in point is the Abbeville Reds
in LA iris. Are they a species, a hybrid swarm, or a hybrid swarm responding to natureal selection and moving toward, but not yet, a new species? I don't know that there are really enough of them left to even make more than a guess.
Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lots of someones, actually. Try Yahoo! Personals
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |