Re: Sdlg. Haft Marks
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Sdlg. Haft Marks
- From: "Harold" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 22:44:42 -0700
Haft marks that do not compliment or add to the attractiveness of the flower
should be a fatal attribute. IMHO This is especially true when the veining
is the historical brown veining. Unfortunately this leads right back to
beauty being in the eye of the beholded. Based on what I can see of your
seedling, I like it and consider that veining to be complimentry. Even Terry
Aitken made that comment about his 02 Concession. Judges appear to be split
on the issue. Some people have a difficult time giving up long held judging
Beautiful View Iris Garden
2048 Hickok Road
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Squires" <email@example.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 9:45 PM
Subject: [iris-photos] Sdlg. Haft Marks
> Giraffe Kneehiz X San Miguel
> This bloomed for the first time in the seedling patch.
> It's from my experimenting with Broken Color X Non-Plicatas.
> I know in the old days haft marks meant sure death to a seedling.
> Now it seems they're a little more acceptable.
> Some garden visitors said oh wow that's nice,
> others just turned their backs and walked away.
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/