hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: TB: Germanica? Purple

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] TB: Germanica? Purple
  • From: "David Ferguson" <manzano57@msn.com>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:21:30 -0700
  • Seal-send-time: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:21:30 -0700

Thanks Bill,
I'm guessing you don't know which clone of I. germanica it is though?  That seems to be a common thing.  I only know for sure what three of mine are (assuming they came with the correct names), they are 'Alba', 'Kochii' (which hasn't flowered yet), and 'Crimson King'.  I also have the 'Florentina' and the 'Albicans' worked out now.
I'm now thinking the yellow might be 'Golden Bow', but haven't seen a clear enough photo of that one to be sure.  I'm betting it's an old Sass hybrid.  Pink is another color I haven't heard of.
Sass used some of the same parents that I suspect I. germanica originated from, so some of his could actually be real I. germanica, just a lot newer.  Don't know if he had any pink IB's.  [I thought both were supposed to be "impossible".]  Somebody needs to work out for certain what the parents of the original germanicas really were though. 
If I. lutescens was indeed the small parent, then I see no reason why other colors couldn't exist.  After all, I. lutescens comes in lots of colors, and if those other colors were to be crossed with a pale or white I. trojana (or mesopotamica /cypriana /belouinii /amas /etc.; all the same wild species?), seems to me you could have lots to choose from.  I suspect that blue/purple is most common because the tetraploid parents were this color, and that ups the odds of bees doing some funny business with any late opening purple I. lutescens (or whatever) flowers, and lowers the odds of crossing with yellows (bees tend to stick with one color at a time).  The white is the most common mutation from the usual blue/purples, so it's not surprising that a few exist.  Some of the tetraploids being grown were likely white, and some of the wild I. lutscens would likely have been white too.  Besides I'm sure people back then looked for the "odd balls" to grow just the way we do.
Well enough speculation.
Does the one in your photo have a stem that tends to curve or go sideways sometimes.  I have one with a similar flower that does, and have wondered if it's not 'Undulata' (think that was the name I saw).

Yahoo! Groups Links

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement