hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: SDB and MDB Space age
iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
  • Subject: Re: SDB and MDB Space age
  • From: "Michael Sutton" <orders@suttoniris.com>
  • Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:03:27 -0700

ï
caught it just as it was closing up....sorry for the poor quality
Mike
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] SDB and MDB Space age

Hi Mike

It's hard to appreciate littlies from a side view, how does the top view look

Colleen

Michael Sutton wrote:
 

ï

Been working on dwarf space age iris for over a decade and have not been really satisfied with the results.  Am not sure dwarfs look good as space agers.......attached is a flounced SDB (red violet/purple) and a petaloid MDB (yellow one) Input on space age dwarfs would be appreciated....does anybody think they are worth the effort?  To me, most end up being narrower then average and, in general, the appendages are very inconsistent.







JPEG image



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement