Re: CULT: Labels
- Subject: Re: [iris-photos] CULT: Labels
- From: "Cheryl Leigh Chamberlin" <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:02:58 -0400
I found it- I didn't do a search for anything, just picked the archive for
July 2000 and started paging through messages. The labels he mentions are
clear laser return address labels, Avery 5667. Maybe if you search on
"Avery" or "5667" you'll get close to it!
PS- checked my history and came up with the page the message was on. From
there I got to this:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Greaves" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: [iris-photos] CULT: Labels
> Al, I just tried searching the archives using "Dallas
> Patterson", "digest 1129" and "6 July 2000" and only get
> this post of yours. How did you get to that digest? I'd
> like to see that article.
> Thanks, Tom
> email@example.com wrote:
> > This is a picture of the labeling method I use. I adopted
> > the process from
> > Dallas Patterson' posting one year ago. See digest 1129, 6
> > July 2000.
> > Ninety-nine per cent of the labels have held up very well.
> > I have noticed on
> > some labels dust creeping behind the top of the label. On
> > the reverse of the
> > marker I have a number which corresponds to my computer
> > listings of the
> > flower, bush or variety etc. It maybe a little large at
> > 29K, but I want to
> > show flower and label.
> > Al Bullock
> > zone 7
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
> > of Service.
> > [Image]
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/