[PHOTO] RE: BB: Batik Photo ID's | Mon, 12 May 2003 19:32:01" />
hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

[PHOTO] RE: BB: Batik Photo ID's

  • Subject: [PHOTO] [iris-photos] RE: BB: Batik Photo ID's
  • From: "Mike Greenfield" redear@infinet.com
  • Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:37:14 -0400

 the first photo named "Batik 3xw" is from the Olympus C-3000.
The second one named "Batik 10xw" is from the C-700UZ.
For Batik the 3000 is better.  The 700 brings the blues out. For some iris neither is accurate. The 3000 takes sharper photos and is more accurate for color on the whole.
 As you might notice the " w " at the end of the file name. I do this to ID photos I have reduced for the web.
 The dark "cutie" in the back is Baltic Star  ten stalks each with a bloom on it. Photo  attached.
Don't ask about the yellow. I am sure it is not Supreme Sultan.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

JPEG image

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index