hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

AIS:classes of iris

  • Subject: [iris-photos] AIS:classes of iris
  • From: Patricia Wenham <h.schinkep@verizon.net>
  • Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 17:19:24 -0700

I believe Robert has a good point here.  Too much of one thing does 
cause a loss of interest.  Something new and different sparks new 
interest.  Referring to the new types by a given name calls attention to 
the new items.  We no longer call iris flags for a good reason.

USDA zone 5

Robt R Pries wrote:

>  The rule that people should apply is how do we create the most 
> diversity in Iris interests and how can each group help maintain the 
> others so that we can attract the most number of people into the 
> genus. The more we concentrate efforts on a particular group the less 
> interesting the society becomes to the

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement