hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive


In a message dated 5/6/2005 11:28:48 PM Mountain Daylight Time, wells@train.missouri.org writes:
First time bloom here. Different sort of flower... I have no info on
this flower in my database. Any help out there?

Hybridizer:  Benbow.  Registered in 1953, introduced in 1954.  An RB in today's system.  A first-generation stolonifera-bred, to use the old term, which more succinctly explains the unusual pattern.  The only pedigree I have for it is I. stolonifera X TB seedling. 

It was registered soon after AIS changed from the old color code system to verbal descriptions and when the older term "squalens" had pretty much been replaced by "blend".  The catch is that the "blend" of the '50s was not what we call a "blend" today.  It meant that the flower had multiple pigments, but said nothing about the pattern. 

This may be more than you want to know, but because the registered description is not very helpful in modern terms I wanted to assure you that what you have looks like the real thing -- and it's indeed a treasure.

Sharon McAllister

Yahoo! Groups Links

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement