hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: New Seedling #23BS7

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] New Seedling #23BS7
  • From: Anita Moran avmoran1@earthlink.net
  • Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 06:06:15 -0400 (GMT-04:00)

Bob I don't find it objectionable
I'm not an experct but I think it is at least close to luminata
The pattern on the CB7 is not so much objectionable as more old fashion

-----Original Message-----
From: iris4u2@comcast.net
Sent: May 26, 2005 11:06 PM
To: iris-photos@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iris-photos] New Seedling #23BS7

This is Seedling 23BS7 ((High Master X 99AD7 (Conjuration X Sweet Musette)) Do I have those parenthesis in the right place? Since the discussion is about haft marks.  Anyone find these objectionable or is this close to being a luminata since they extend the body of the falls.  Input please.
Bob in Denver
Iris4u Iris Garden

Yahoo! Groups Links

Yahoo! Groups Links

Anita Moran
USDA Zone 6b

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement