hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: HYB: another IMM grandchild

  • Subject: Re: Re: HYB: another IMM grandchild
  • From: "Ann Conway" <amconway@telusplanet.net>
  • Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 17:31:25 -0600

This is where my "iris bias" comes into play : )
I prefer the older forms, pre-60's for the most part. I don't find it as pleasing if the falls tend toward "round" or if they touch (or close to it). Personal preference...I couldn't possibly judge an iris show! (Not that I think that they should be as long and narrow as they were in the 20's generally...)  On the plus side, if you mulch a lot of irises that look like this, I would gladly pay for the phytosanitary certificate and shipping to bring them to Canada!! Your ones that need work are my very nice irises!
Ann Conway
----- Original Message -----
From: Linda Mann
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 2:23 PM
Subject: [iris-photos] Re: HYB: another IMM grandchild

Thanks Ann, but to my eye, the falls seem disproportionately long and
narrow. I use the "thumb" test to evaluate width of falls - any time I
can see daylight both sides of my thumb when I put it between the falls
at their base, I think that's too narrow.

But I'm no judge - just going by what pleases my own eye, so maybe
others would judge it ok too.


This thing was awful when it first opened - falls stuck straight out and
the ruffling was all above that, so you couldn't see the edge of the
falls at all, even looking down from above. Very unattractive. Stalks
on sibs from the cross have been too weak to support the blooms - this
one is better, but will have to see what happens in future years.

Sure wish <this> one would rebloom! <g>

<Gotta say, I don't see much need for improvement on that bloom!
Interesting colors, well formed standards, nicely shaped falls- fine
proportions ....
Ann Conway>
Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8
East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.DiscoverET.org/etis>
Region 7, Kentucky-Tennessee <http://www.aisregion7.org>
American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org>
talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/>
photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/>
online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1415 - Release Date: 5/5/2008 6:01 AM

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement