hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re: Rot New Mexico

  • Subject: Re: [iris-photos] Re: Rot New Mexico
  • From: oneofcultivars@aol.com
  • Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 01:21:19 EDT

In a message dated 10/10/2002 4:52:34 PM Central Daylight Time, dferguson@cabq.gov writes:

Often when the main tuber rots, existing young offsets survive, even if the
rot is not treated, but now I treat always

You appear to be using four treatments, maybe three. Clorox, physical removal of visible portion of the rot, ultraviolet radiation (sun/light), and some drying.

Sometime when you are fortunate (gh) and have enough rot in enough rhizomes of the same iris, at the same aproximate stage in each, treat each with only one of the treatments you are using and treat one the same way you are treating now. I have no idea what the results in New Mexico climate will be but am genuinely curious if you decide to.

gh = gallows humor
Bill Burleson 7a/b
Old South Iris Society

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index