hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: HYB: carried away makign crosses

In a message dated 4/16/2003 5:08:26 PM Central Standard Time, 
crook1945@yahoo.com writes:

> In 
> various types of plants the ones that don`t look
> promising in there juvenile years turn out to be the
> best ones after 4 or 5 years of growing . Would this
> occur in Irises as well ?

My personal experience says, "Yes!" In my seedling beds, irises often look 
different during the second year of bloom.  Usually, the REAL spectacular 
ones look worse! It's not wise to brag about your new seedlings until you've 
seen them bloom a second season! They can really embarrass you! 

But, some of the bad ones start looking good! First year bloom is often 
uncharacteristic of the established bloom.  

For this reason alone, I don't recommend trashing seedlings at the end of the 
first year's bloom.  I've even heard people say that they discard any 
seedling that doesn't bloom the first year.  Again, I disagree with this 

Betty W in South-central KY zone 6

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index