hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

HIST/ SPEC-Pallida "authority"/Gerard and Johnson

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: HIST/ SPEC-Pallida "authority"/Gerard and Johnson
  • From: Henryanner@aol.com
  • Date: Tue, 8 Apr 1997 08:49:07 -0600 (MDT)

On the question of the "namer" of Iris pallida, Jeff, speaking to Mark,
wrote: 
<< 
 The correct spelling of the name is Gerard, and since I. pallida is a
 naturally occuring species, he was, of course, not the hybridizer, or even
 the introducer, except in the limited sense that as the author of a well
 known Elizabethan herbal, he gave the first printed "scientific"
 description of this iris in English (in the year cited above by Mark) .
  >>

To get tedious about taxonomic issues, the "authority", the person who is
credited with first "naming" this plant in scientific terms in print, is
Lamarck (Mathew, p.31f), that is, Jean Baptiste Antoine Pierrre Monnet de
Lamarck (1744-1829). So in botanical citatations, the plant is Iris pallida
Lamarck.

There are serious questions about whether Gerard was the "author" of much of
his Herbal, much less the plant names therein. In a period when
unacknowledged appropriation of material from previously printed sources was
not unusual and the laws of copyright were still being developed, he still
managed to get himself discussed in unflattering terms, not least by the
botanist/apothecary Thomas Johnson who revised the earlier edition of the
Herbal, producing the 1633 "emaculatus" edition, also known as "Johnson's
Gerard".

Anner Whitehead, Richmond, VA  henryanner@aol.com
Not into yarbs as such, but as research volunteer at a museum of Tudor and
Stuart life became a minor "authority" on English horticultural literature to
1660, especially pomology. 





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index