hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: "Ii" for plural "Iris"

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: Re: "Ii" for plural "Iris"
  • From: "J. Griffin Crump" <jgcrump@erols.com>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 05:40:13 -0600 (MDT)

Tom Tadfor Little wrote:
> 
>  This is not a question of Latin
> inflection; it is a question of medieval orthography. There was once an
> established practice of indicating that an abbreviation was plural by
> simply duplicating the last letter of the abbreviation. This survives today
> in English only in a few relics, such as "pp." for "pages" (plural of "p.")
> and "mss." for manuscripts (plural of "ms.").
> 
> The practice also survives in botanical writing, although it has become
> considerably less common in recent decades. It works like this:
> 
> T. tarda and T. pulchella (tulips) => Tt. tarda and pulchella
> S. spurium and S. album (sedums) => Ss. spurium and album
> I. pumila and I. pallida (irises) => Ii. pumila and pallida
> 
> and so on.
> 
> In this case, I have to break ranks with my fellow editor and agree with
> Clarence: "Ii." is perfectly acceptable and conventional. I suspect,
> though, that "I. pumila and I. pallida" may be a preferable idiom for
> modern readers.
> 
Tom -- I bow to your superior knowledge of taxonomic usage. To
paraphrase: De usu non disputandum est.

Griff Crump, along the Potomac, where the local TV stations say the
temperature is 29 degrees, but my thermometers, happily, say 33.





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index