hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Re:KILT LILT etc

  • Subject: Re: [iris-talk] Re:KILT LILT etc
  • From: "Mike Greenfield" <redear@infinet.com>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:52:16 -0400

----- Original Message -----
From: <RYFigge@aol.com>
To: <iris-talk@yahoogroups.com>; <ptyerman@ozemail.com.au>;
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [iris-talk] Re:KILT LILT etc

> Paul is so correct about descriptions in R & I-- the criticism/suggestion
> goes to the hybridizer!  It is very frustratinng!  There are SO many
> about an iris that should be described!  The Stylearms (and they can be
> really spectacular, but you wonder if the hybridizer ever looks at them!).
> Is the rib the same color or contrasting?     Etc ad infinitum,   The
> is it the same color from end to inside?  And what does "tipped" mean ?
> end of the beard or  the tip of each "hair"?  I don't think they are
> consistent about this.  And how about the haft?  No marks, color,  etc
> of course there is a possibility of fragrance -- however people's snifters
> vary and I think I remember someone saying that the "smell" changes with
> -- that pinks eventually "stink" ( a word my mother frowned upon, when I
> it as a child -- there is a more polite word!)   There are many variables,
> realize, not just  people's eyes and snifters, but also weather and
soil ---
> but still, more guidelines would be a big help!
> At one time there was talk of requiring photos when registering an iris.!
> That might work, but then there is the variable in photographer. and film.
>  I'll never forget the catalogues, MANY years ago, from Cooley and
> and how you would not recognize AMIGOS GUITAR as the same iris, they were
> pictured so differently.
> Well, I've put my foot in it with my 2-cents worth, so I'll retire for a
> while and eat lunch so I am in better shape to lick my wounds that will
>   Rosalie nr Baltimore,USA zone 7   ryfigge@aol.com

 Rosalie  you are too much your post makes my day.
Wondering how much you could get on EBAY for a confederate half penny.

I had seen decriptions and photos of HONKY TONK BLUES and it did not do
anything for me. I saw it at a show a couple of years ago and it went to the
top of my want list. I haven't learned how to look at a description and then
picture the iris yet. They need to be better.

Mike Greenfield
SW OH Zone 5b, USA

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE credit report with a FREE CreditCheck
Monitoring Service trial


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index