hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: CAT: Survey of Iris Suppliers - Results

  • Subject: Re: CAT: Survey of Iris Suppliers - Results
  • From: rainacre@aol.com
  • Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 12:23:47 EDT

Without knowing exactly how this survey was conducted, I find the results 
problematic. From my own experience with the many of the suppliers/growers 
listed, most of the high ratings seem possible while most of the low ratings 
do not seem credible. I wonder what part the number of "extras" included 
played in the results. I also wonder how accurate the results can be if as 
few as four gardeners responded for a supplier. 

Fred Kerr

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index