hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: CULT: Red irises

In a message dated 8/22/05 1:38:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
kellydn@iastate.edu writes:

<< Too often the general garden public has such a  narrow view of the immense 
work produced by our breeders, something I find rather disheartening 
considering the excellent cultivars available.  I feel that a considerable amount of 
effort should be placed on educating the public and promoting the newer 
cultivars as horticultural materials not collectors pieces. >>

My own observation is that too often the general garden public has purchased 
irises only to experience disappointment with misnamed cultivars, or other 
nasty but entirely predictable surprises, notably soft rot and borers. I frankly 
don't think much more is understood about the borer than was known in the 
1930s, and that is a bad bad thing because a rollicking infestation of borers or 
soft rot can be a life changing experience, and it is well we admit it. 

But, you see, I don't think most mature gardeners are enthusiastic about 
being briefed in the finer points of chemical warfare against routine iris 
problems. I don't know a single gardener of whatever degree of sophistication--and I 
know all kinds-- who is not environmentally conscious, if not militantly 
organic, at some level. Moreover, I think it to be lamented that AIS is not 
publicly more green. Once when I raised this very point there was some response to 
the effect that the non-profit thing precluded any verdant stance, but I doubt 
that is correct. I think the situation is  disappointing, and quite aside from 
any personal moral or spirtual imperatives one might feel along these lines, 
anyone who knows diddly knows that three things which put people off plant 
societies are the competativeness, the infighting, and chemicals. 

Until such time as the hard core iris fanciers, and AIS, can offer better 
solutions to the routine problems which arise in growing irises, and until such 
time as it is understood that one non-negotiable attribute of a fine iris is 
its horticultural soundness, its its joie de vivre, if you will, I personally 
think you are going to have a hard time talking the general garden public into 
beating the big bass drum in the rainbow parade, and the iris will remain a 
specialist's plant, a category which appears to excuse all sins. 


Anner Whitehead 
Richmond VA USA

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement