hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

CULT:HYB: Trial Gardens [was: Re: HYB: AIS: Trial Garden Idea Redux]

In the ongoing series of threads about gardenability and Trial Gardens, a
thought repeatedly has come to mind.  I found it voiced by Anner Whitehead
and Griff Crump in their recent exchange:  "'is the aftermarket doing all
the meaningful testing?' --- the answer to which is also, probably, yes."

There are many, many "Trial Gardens" in existence around the country (or
world for that matter)--every commercial garden--doing that

The more frank catalogs, and I am mindful of Phil Williams' Rockytop Gardens
catalog, are quite useful in looking at the potential in making purchases
more than one or two years away from introduction.

Private, very candid remarks by a judge (official or otherwise) in another
area of the country than one's own, are also wonderful resources of
evaluation, especially if they are located near one of the clusters of major
breeders or introducers.

Irises that lack *either* quality or gardenability disappear from most
catalogs very quickly, or never get there at all.  Every local retail grower
has a "trial garden" on display, if one wanted to avail onesself of the
opportunity to see performance, branching, bud count or attractiveness of
foliage first hand.

Raw, year of introduction, purchases sight unseen is undoubtedly somewhat of
a "crap shoot," but pedigrees often tell much--with exceptions.  Even rave
reviews in the *Bulletin* of an iris seen only once in one year at a
convention can be useful, but have to be taken with a fair measure of salt.
I've bought some I later felt were a waste of my money that had been
featured in glowing *Bulletin* reviews.  I was very surprised.  Usually the
reaction to a variety at a convention is a useful guide, just not always.

Some otherwise unknowns have been very happy surprises.  Often these come
from small volume, isolated breeders away from the major commercial centers.
I am mindful of the generally very high quality output of Tom Parkhill in
the Knoxville area.

Neil Mogensen  z 7  Reg 4  western NC mountains

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement