hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: AIS:Awards:Symposium

Maybe this is a politically incorrect statement, but why can't we write any in? Seems like I remember that capability some time ago. I have gobs of irises that are not top 100, some of which you mention, that I would love to vote for, as they are pretty AND perform. How does a relatively new iris, one which indeed does seem to walk on water, make the voting list? There are obviously new varieties on the 100 list every year. Maybe I shouldn't ask, but who gets them on the ballot to be voted upon?

At 06:05 PM 8/31/2005, you wrote:
In a message dated 8/31/2005 3:50:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
gschubert@earthlink.net writes:

<<I do have perhaps half of the top 100 and the vast majority of the top 20,
but I always wondered about some even in the top 20 that looked pretty darn
plain, at least in my garden, compared to the rest.>>
We're allowed to vote for 25. I usually mark under 20 when I go through the
list. I've been raising modern irises for 20 years. Had about 600 in
Alvaton and have since grown another 300-500. Quit counting.

I've grown most of the ones on the list. Many or most have bloomed. But I
don't vote for them unless they 'perform' in my garden. There are many
beautiful irises that bloom in my garden every year, but most don't perform.

Many of my irises fit the 'pretty face' category. Wish I could vote for
them but I just can't! As an example, I have XYZ. (hope there's not an iris
with that name?!) XYZ is a beautiful iris and it blooms each and every spring.
It usually has 1 perfect stalk. Show bench quality but good in the garden.
Flawless. But I would NEVER vote for it on the symposium.

I've had XYZ for 5 or 6 years. And each spring I get the 1 bloom stalk.
Each summer it increases just enough to stay alive. After all this time I have
less than 1 fan per year. AND it still only blooms 1 stalk per year. (XYZ
is NOT it's real name . . .) I will not vote for it.

Then there is ZYX (think they're related) . This one has three or four
stalks each year, but they never grow more than a couple of inches out of the

So long as there ARE irises that perform to required standards in my garden,
I can't vote for those that do not. Some that perform reliably? Skating
Party, Song of Norway, Strictly Ballroom, & Kevin's Theme. There are others.

Many of my good irises are no longer on the ballot. Once upon a time we
could write those in, but no more.

Betty W. in South-central KY Zone 6
Bridge In Time Iris Garden@website:
_www.thegardensite.com/irises/bridgeintime/_ (http://www.thegardensite.com/i
_Reblooming Iris - Home Page_ (http://www.rebloomingiris.com/)
_iris-photos archives_ (http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/)
_iris-talk archives_ (http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/)
_AIS: American Iris Society website_ (http://www.irises.org/)

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement