hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: TB: standards


I doubt many would like floppy standards.  Floppy falls aren't all that
popular either.  Maybe floppy standards have their place on a flattie, though.
 Don Nebeker, at the local iris sale on Saturday, had some photos of flatties
that are showing up in his seedlings, one of which was quite pretty, a blue
purple with six falls and six contrasting orange/yellow beards.  No floppy
standards there, though, since there aren't any standards.  I've seen photos
of a quasi-flattie that looks like a magnolia--I'd like to try that one someday.

I've also noticed some small standards relative to falls in some photos.  It
looks odd to me, but I suppose one could develop a taste for it, since there's
nothing inherently ugly about it.  Maybe.  Or it could catch on as a novelty.
 It probably doesn't conform to the Platonic Form of Iris, as outlined by the
Philosopher Judges in the judge's handbook.  (A little joke there for those of
you who had to sit through a philosophy class in school.)

Kent

Autmirislvr@aol.com said:

> In a message dated 8/8/2006 10:29:20 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
> ChatOWhitehall@aol.com writes:
> 
> <<That, I am told, is the usual explanation for  many such  annoyances.>>
>  
> Hmmm. . . . could be.  I will complain more about the ones that  receive 
> awards!  One of the worst in my garden was AMAZON BRIDE.  It  didn't even take 
> rain to cause the standards to cave in, just a few hours of  time.  Random 
> pictures in other gardens showed the same thing, yet it won  an HM (at
least.)  It 
> was one of my favored color classes at the  time and a child of Bride's Halo!  
>  
> My conclusion, at the time, was that some people liked this characteristic  a 
> lot more than I did/do.  A second year of growing and viewing didn't  improve 
> it in my garden.  
>  
> Linda, the midrib is weak in these irises.  Is that a part of  substance?   
> I'd thought substance pertained more to the petal  thickness/consistency?  Or 
> not??  
>  
> I'm not knocking anyone's preference.  We all have likes and  dislikes.  
> These are just some of mine! 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement