hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: CULT: Patently Confused

From: Iarejan@aol.com

In a message dated 8/15/99 7:34:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
vincelewonski@yahoo.com writes:

<<   If you can patent a rose, you should be able to patent
 an iris, right?  >>
    GADZOOKS!   I hope not!   Can you imagine the cost of an intro when 
everyone but the hybridizer has to pay a patent fee just to sell it???  I 
really don't know about recent patent law, or how it affects plants.   Heck, 
I only discovered that iris rebloom about a year ago.  <g>

Janet Natale

--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------

ONElist:  your connection to like-minds and kindred spirits.


 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index