Re: RE:HYB:Glaciata-genetics-second thoughts
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Jan Clark" <janclarx@h...> wrote:
> >Thus, if glaciata gene is "pla" and a variation of plicata and on
> >the same gene site, then it will work as Jan indicated. If it is
> >seperate gene site and acts as a modifier gene then it will work
> >had outined and you would need both sets of genes in full recessive
> >form for expression. I beleive that there are two sets of genes on
> >diferent sites. The second site could either be for the luminata
> >or for the glaciata gene or both. This certainly enters into
> >theoretical areas. I will need to reflect on this some more and go
> >back to my hybridizing records to pull out the information I have.
> I guess there hasn't been enough work done on this to say for sure.
> understanding was that the glaciata pla was located at the pl
> the luminata plu 'might' be or perhaps not. This might be worked
> statistics, if someone was willing to do enough crosses, and spend
> growing them on, and testing the crosses, and recording the
results. That is
> probably nearly as big an ask, as expecting someone to unravel the
> strand, and translate the results using electron microscopy, or
> fancy techniques they use these days.
> I think it would be more fun just hypothesising the results of a
> studying it's pedigree, then doing the cross and seeing what shows
> Cheers, Jan
I had been giving this some thought. I use to keep track of all the
offspring from crosses to evaluate the genetics but found this to be
very time consuming. At this time I evaluate seedlings as I go and
turf out plants not desired as they bloom. As a result I can only
gestimate the ratios of different crosses and the possible genetic
factors. One thought is for myself or some one playing with luminata
/glaciatas to hire someone (perhaps with help of a scientific grant
from AIS) to collect the data so it can be evaluated later. As I look
at the various outcomes from
plicata/glaciata/fancy/dotted/streaked/brokencolor etc, I don't see
how we can get everthing on one allele site. There are too many
variations. Every luminata seem to be able to produce glaciatas in
their offspring. Keith Keppels luminatas come from a long line of
inbreeding involving plants known to have the pla gene. So?? where
did the lumnata come from? I'm rereading some of the old literature
to see what it says. Its been awhile since I looked at it. Most of
the time theory follows experience to provide an explination of what
we get/saw. the theory is then used to make a prediction and then the
theory is tested. It might be time to do this and start colecting
data. If pla is a seperate allele on the PL location then there may
well be lots of glaciatas out here that we are not aware of. Ususlly
you know for sure when they come from a plicat cross as pl is a
recessive gene. If they come from a back cross of glaciata X Pl then
a test cross with a plicata would be nessesary to evaluate for sure.
Thus we may be looking at a pure coloured carotene/lycopene (non
anthocyin) that is a glaciata and not know it. It certainly would be
a worthwhile test of whether the glaciata gene is on the Pl locus.
Any one willing to try? You would have to note the colour patern of
each offspring and be prepared to cross back to a pl pl pl pl plicta
in order to properly evaluate the outcome. The ratio of types of off
spring would be needed for proper evaluation.
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!