hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Judges

Croftway@aol.com wrote:
> Judges:
> I'm going to throw in my opinion on this - I love a good argument!
> Firstly, any judge who has his/her opinion changed by seeing a photo of a
> variety in a book or calendar is, in my opinion, not fit to be an accredited
> judge. 

If you will accept a rewording from "has his/her opinion changed" to
"changes the way she/he votes" I would certainly agree.

> Any evidence of any judge being diverted from their true path by this
> should be made known to the relevant authorities and that judge should be
> struck off!

Not easily done, but a good goal.

Gerry--novice judge

  • References:
    • Judges
      • From: Croftway@aol.com

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index