hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Evolution of Rhizomes, Bulbs?

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: Evolution of Rhizomes, Bulbs?
  • From: Gerry Snyder <gcsnyd@loop.com>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 18:09:10 -0700 (MST)

Iris can be either rhizomatous or bulbous. Which is the more primitive?

It would fit my picture of how things should be if, say, iris descended 
from bulbous ancestors and some (most) decided that rhizomes were better 
and switched. But then rhizomes would be restricted to iris, which they 
are not.

Or are different rhizomatous plants the result of convergent evolution?

Or is the above true with bulbs and rhizomes switched?

All answers, whether based on theory or knowledge, will be appreciated.

-Gerry, who had the heat on in his car on the way home from work for the first
time today
gcsnyd@loop.com    AIS Region 15
Warm, winterless Los Angeles
President of San Fernando Valley Iris Society
My work?  Helping generate data for http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/galileo

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index