hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

TB: Registered height?

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: TB: Registered height?
  • From: "william b. cook" <billc@atlantic.net>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 20:10:05 -0700 (MST)

     When in Kentucky, most of my Irises were fairly close to the
registered height.  I considered being within two inches as being close
enough.  There were a few that did always bloom much lower than the
registered height.
     One that especially comes to mind is VICTORIA FALLS.  This one always
bloomed no more than 18 " tall.  Only on one occasion did the stalk have a
branch.  All other Irises in the same bed performed as one would expect.  I
have no idea why this one Iris always bloomed low and sparse.
Needless to say, I do not have this one in Florida.
     If I have survivors, I will compare bloom height with registered
height here.

Mark A. Cook		Low:   32 F  ( 0 C)
billc@atlantic.net	High:   67 F  (19 C)
Dunnellon, FL.		Now:    55 F  (13 C)      Today was sunny, now we have
light rain.

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index