hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: TB: Awards....was....HISTORIC VS. MODERN TB's -Lengthy

  • To: Multiple recipients of list <iris-l@rt66.com>
  • Subject: Re: TB: Awards....was....HISTORIC VS. MODERN TB's -Lengthy
  • From: John Montgomery <monashee@junction.net>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 17:40:07 -0700 (MST)

At 03:22 PM 97-12-17 -0700, Walter Moores wrote:
>	The ones I had reference to are SILVERADO and HONKY TONK BLUES.  I
>have two fans of these in the many years I have grown them.  They do not
>increase, nor do they bloom.  1998 will be the last year for them if they
>do not win, place or show.  SKYWATCH grew well but bloomed only every
>three or four years  WINTER OLYMPICS and PACIFIC PANORAMA were never a
>problem.  I have never grown MARY GEDDESS.

I guess there are geographical differences. SILVERADO grows like a pig
here. Too vigorous really for my taste. HONKY TONK BLUES is more restrained
but acceptably vigorous. SKY WATCH always blooms well.

John Montgomery
Vernon  BC  Zone 5

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index